Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4990.1128700610@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?
Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
>> Also they
>> don't need to modify
>> scripts, can't they just write thier own pg_cacnel_backend to
>> return int
>> based on the boolean version?
> No, because you can't overload based purely on return type. I suppose
> they could write it to take an int8 pid or something, but that's a hack.
Well, how many people want to vote for Andreas' suggestion of having
both
int pg_cancel_backend(int)bool pg_backend_cancel(int)
with the former deprecated but still there for backward compatibility?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: