Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?

On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 11:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
> >> Also they 
> >> don't need to modify 
> >> scripts, can't they just write thier own pg_cacnel_backend to 
> >> return int 
> >> based on the boolean version?
> 
> > No, because you can't overload based purely on return type. I suppose
> > they could write it to take an int8 pid or something, but that's a hack.
> 
> Well, how many people want to vote for Andreas' suggestion of having
> both
> 
>     int pg_cancel_backend(int)
>     bool pg_backend_cancel(int)
> 
> with the former deprecated but still there for backward compatibility?

I could vote for:
       bool pg_query_cancel(int)       
backend_cancel or cancel_backend sounds like it should terminate the
entire backend like kill -TERM would do.
--