Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
От
Hannu Krosing
Тема
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Дата
Msg-id
1252529008.4080.21.camel@hvost1700
Ответ на
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types (Pavel Stehule)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
RfD: more powerful "any" types Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types James Pye <lists@jwp.name>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types James Pye <lists@jwp.name>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Hannu Krosing <hannu@krosing.net>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types decibel <decibel@decibel.org>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Hannu Krosing <hannu@krosing.net>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types decibel <decibel@decibel.org>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Hannu Krosing <hannu@krosing.net>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types decibel <decibel@decibel.org>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types decibel <decibel@decibel.org>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types decibel <decibel@decibel.org>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types decibel <decibel@decibel.org>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types daveg <daveg@sonic.net>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types daveg <daveg@sonic.net>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 21:57 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2009/9/9 Alvaro Herrera :
> > Pavel Stehule escribió:
> >> 2009/9/9 Alvaro Herrera :
> >
> >> > I already published a pseudo-sprintf function in the wiki here:
> >> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Sprintf I'm looking for something
> >> > better, not just the same hacks.
> >> >
> >> > I don't see any good reason that the function needs to be far from core.
> >>
> >> what is use case? Why you need sprintf function, when you have ||
> >> operator. This functionality is redundant and out of standard. What I
> >> know, only MySQL has similar function.
> >
> > Extensive use of || turns into horrible messes quickly. sprintf() makes
> > this kind of thing much cleaner. You could use strcat/strcpy in C too,
> > but do you? You could argue that sprintf is redundant in C, yet it
> > turns out to be extremely useful.
> >
>
> Yes, I agree. But this functionality you will use only in plpgsql
> language. I thing, so there could be some library that should be
> separated from standard functions. It would be nice, when people
> clearly understand if use some enhancing functionality or some base
> sql functionality.
There is lots of stuff in postgreSQL, especially functions, that is not
"some base sql functionality", yet is in core.
>
> we could to have schema plpgsql. And there could be function subst,
>
> then in your plpgsql proc you can call
>
> if (...) then
> message := plpgsql.subst('some message:% ...', some value, ...);
> ....
>
> if you would, then you can add plpgsql schema to search path.
>
> I dislike to use name sprintf, because this or similar function isn't
> real sprintf function - it doesn't use compatible format string with
> sprintf function.
call it format(txt, variadic "any") - that's what it does
> regards
> Pavel Stehule
>
> > One use case is using it for error messages in RAISE/USING. Yes, I am
> > aware you can use concatenation there.
> >
> > --
> > Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
> >
>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления