Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David E. Wheeler
Тема Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Дата
Msg-id 243532DD-6324-4D18-B61A-A8052CDED705@kineticode.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sep 9, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> In order for this to work in general, we'd need FUNC_MAX_ARGS  
>> different
>> types, which is currently defined as 100 in our code.
>
> But here, "any" would work perfectly fine, since there's no need for
> any two arguments to be tied to each other or the result.

Well, only if you write your functions in C. I'd like to be able to  
write sprintf() in PL/pgSQL. Or PL/Perl, for that matter.

Best,

David


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types