Обсуждение: www search behaviour
I am trying to search for "to_char" in mailing archives but I get results with "char". Is this correct? Just try searching for "NON_EXEC_STATIC" and mixed results is shown. Regards, Gevik
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Gevik Babakhani wrote:
> I am trying to search for "to_char" in mailing archives but I get results
> with "char". Is this correct?
> Just try searching for "NON_EXEC_STATIC" and mixed results is shown.
>
We discussed this several times and know what to do. Seems, Magnus
is busy with other things
> Regards,
> Gevik
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
Regards, Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:50:19AM +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Gevik Babakhani wrote: > > >I am trying to search for "to_char" in mailing archives but I get results > >with "char". Is this correct? > >Just try searching for "NON_EXEC_STATIC" and mixed results is shown. > > > > We discussed this several times and know what to do. Seems, Magnus > is busy with other things Yeah, it's climbing up my TODO list... //Magnus
> Yeah, it's climbing up my TODO list... Anything that I can do to help?
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Gevik Babakhani wrote:
>> Yeah, it's climbing up my TODO list...
>
> Anything that I can do to help?
Several variants:
1. Create custom parser for pgweb, which doesn't mean that '_' is a
separator
2. Create synonym dictionary for pgweb, which lists all pg specific
terms
1. is a most right way, 2. is a most easy way, just create word stats,
see all terms with '_' and create pgvars dictionary like
some_word some_word
Then created text search configuration , test it and give it to Magnus.
btw, Magnus, did you move to 8.3 ?
Regards, Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:54:34AM +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Gevik Babakhani wrote: > > >>Yeah, it's climbing up my TODO list... > > > >Anything that I can do to help? > > Several variants: > > 1. Create custom parser for pgweb, which doesn't mean that '_' is a > separator > 2. Create synonym dictionary for pgweb, which lists all pg specific > terms > > 1. is a most right way, 2. is a most easy way, just create word stats, > see all terms with '_' and create pgvars dictionary like > some_word some_word Didn't we also talk about option 3, a custom dictionary that strips the underscores? Where could poteitnally use the regexp one as well? If you do pt 2, I can put it in right away. It'll take a reindexing of the whole db though. (Well, any of the options will) > Then created text search configuration , test it and give it to Magnus. > btw, Magnus, did you move to 8.3 ? Yes, we're on 8.3. And it's great ;-) //Magnus
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:54:34AM +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Gevik Babakhani wrote: >> >>>> Yeah, it's climbing up my TODO list... >>> >>> Anything that I can do to help? >> >> Several variants: >> >> 1. Create custom parser for pgweb, which doesn't mean that '_' is a >> separator >> 2. Create synonym dictionary for pgweb, which lists all pg specific >> terms >> >> 1. is a most right way, 2. is a most easy way, just create word stats, >> see all terms with '_' and create pgvars dictionary like >> some_word some_word > > Didn't we also talk about option 3, a custom dictionary that strips the > underscores? Where could poteitnally use the regexp one as well? I forget it :) > > If you do pt 2, I can put it in right away. It'll take a reindexing of the > whole db though. (Well, any of the options will) > > >> Then created text search configuration , test it and give it to Magnus. >> btw, Magnus, did you move to 8.3 ? > > Yes, we're on 8.3. And it's great ;-) I'm busy, I and Teodor are going to Toulouse (France) btw. I think Gevik could help you. Custom parser will be not difficult. About dictionary - http://vo.astronet.ru/arxiv/dict_regex.html, I'm not sure if it's ported to 8.3. I'll ping author. Regards, Oleg _____________________________________________________________ Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru), Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
Oleg Bartunov wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Gevik Babakhani wrote: > >>> Yeah, it's climbing up my TODO list... >> >> Anything that I can do to help? > > Several variants: > > 1. Create custom parser for pgweb, which doesn't mean that '_' is a > separator If it's of interest, I've got a custom parser here which is based on the default defined in wparser_def.c but includes an "identifier" type which allows underscores. Bear in mind this is the first bit of C coding I've done in decades, but it's only tweaking the default parser and adapting it to a contrib/ format so I don't think I could have gone that far wrong. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
> If it's of interest, I've got a custom parser here which is > based on the default defined in wparser_def.c but includes an > "identifier" type which allows underscores. Would it be possible to share this code with us? Regards, Gevik.
Gevik Babakhani wrote: >> If it's of interest, I've got a custom parser here which is >> based on the default defined in wparser_def.c but includes an >> "identifier" type which allows underscores. > > Would it be possible to share this code with us? Oh course - don't know if this list allows attachments, I'll send you a copy directly Gevik. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd