Обсуждение: ruby-postgres module needs work, maintainer gone
Hi, The ruby-postgres module needs some work, and I have some patches. However, the maintainer Dave Lee is not replying to my emails. Does anyone on this list know how to contact him? If not, I'll try to get my fixes submitted through the Ruby community somehow. If you're a user of this module, please let me know, and let me know if you have any problems with it. Regards,Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis wrote: > Hi, > > The ruby-postgres module needs some work, and I have some patches. > However, the maintainer Dave Lee is not replying to my emails. > > Does anyone on this list know how to contact him? If not, I'll try to > get my fixes submitted through the Ruby community somehow. > > If you're a user of this module, please let me know, and let me know if > you have any problems with it. I haven't heard anything from the plruby guy in a while. You might need to become the new maintainer. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jeff Davis wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The ruby-postgres module needs some work, and I have some patches.
>> However, the maintainer Dave Lee is not replying to my emails.
>>
>> Does anyone on this list know how to contact him? If not, I'll try to
>> get my fixes submitted through the Ruby community somehow.
>>
>> If you're a user of this module, please let me know, and let me know if
>> you have any problems with it.
>
> I haven't heard anything from the plruby guy in a while. You might need
> to become the new maintainer.
ruby-postgres != plruby
SIncerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Jeff Davis wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> The ruby-postgres module needs some work, and I have some patches. > >> However, the maintainer Dave Lee is not replying to my emails. > >> > >> Does anyone on this list know how to contact him? If not, I'll try to > >> get my fixes submitted through the Ruby community somehow. > >> > >> If you're a user of this module, please let me know, and let me know if > >> you have any problems with it. > > > > I haven't heard anything from the plruby guy in a while. You might need > > to become the new maintainer. > > ruby-postgres != plruby Oops, sorry. I got confused. I also have not heard from the ruby-postgres guy, but as a community we are less likely to have heard from him because interfaces are more independent. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 15:18 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > ruby-postgres != plruby > > Oops, sorry. I got confused. I also have not heard from the > ruby-postgres guy, but as a community we are less likely to have heard > from him because interfaces are more independent. > I finally did reach the ruby-postgres guy. He said he would incorporate my patches. I'd like a real release (that becomes a gem), because the current ruby- postgres release is not sufficient (in a number of ways), and I got at least one response from someone who literally skipped PostgreSQL support in their app because of it: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/msg/450c15cb3848129b I expect there will be more patches also. Hopefully we can get this up to speed. I've been informed that the Ruby community's gem releases are heavily dependent on rubyforge. Without involvement of the rubyforge ruby- postgres project, releases would have to be under a different name (which would mean changing client code -- not desirable). This is my understanding, anyway. Regards,Jeff Davis
Jeff Davis wrote: > On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 15:18 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > ruby-postgres != plruby > > > > Oops, sorry. I got confused. I also have not heard from the > > ruby-postgres guy, but as a community we are less likely to have heard > > from him because interfaces are more independent. > > > > I finally did reach the ruby-postgres guy. He said he would incorporate > my patches. > > I'd like a real release (that becomes a gem), because the current ruby- > postgres release is not sufficient (in a number of ways), and I got at > least one response from someone who literally skipped PostgreSQL support > in their app because of it: > > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/msg/450c15cb3848129b > > I expect there will be more patches also. Hopefully we can get this up > to speed. > > I've been informed that the Ruby community's gem releases are heavily > dependent on rubyforge. Without involvement of the rubyforge ruby- > postgres project, releases would have to be under a different name > (which would mean changing client code -- not desirable). This is my > understanding, anyway. Good, sounds like things are moving forward. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +