Обсуждение: Help installing 8.0.2 rpms on RH 3.0
I need some help,
I am doing initial investigation into the next project. Part of the
project is to upgrade from RH 2.1 to 3.0 (or greater) and to upgrade
from Postgresql 7.3.4 to a newer version. Currently we are compiling
our version of postgresql and I would really like to get away from
that. However, I am having some difficulty installing the
postgresql.org RH 3.0 rpms for Postgresql 8.0.2.
Here is what I have:
Virgin install of RH ES 3.0 from cd's (no update run right now)
When I try to start installing the Postgresql rpms, I get the following:
[root@localhost postgresql_rpms]# rpm -Uvh
postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG.i686.rpm
warning: postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG.i686.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY,
key ID 748f7d0e
error: Failed dependencies:
libecpg.so.4 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG
libpgtypes.so.1 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG
libpq.so.3 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG
Suggested resolutions:
rh-postgresql-libs-7.3.4-8.i386.rpm
I've tried this with both the rh-postgresql-libs-7.3.4-8.i386.rpm
installed and not installed and am getting the same results.
What do I need to do to get the rpms to install????
Thanks for any help,
Chris
> Here is what I have: > Virgin install of RH ES 3.0 from cd's (no update run right now) > > When I try to start installing the Postgresql rpms, I get the following: > [root@localhost postgresql_rpms]# rpm -Uvh > postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG.i686.rpm > warning: postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG.i686.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, > key ID 748f7d0e > error: Failed dependencies: > libecpg.so.4 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG > libpgtypes.so.1 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG > libpq.so.3 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG > Suggested resolutions: > rh-postgresql-libs-7.3.4-8.i386.rpm It looks like you already have postgresql installed via RH 3. You need to remove it first, then install 8. Honestly, when working with the RH ES version it is better to compile anyway. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- Your PostgreSQL solutions provider, Command Prompt, Inc. 24x7 support - 1.800.492.2240, programming, and consulting Home of PostgreSQL Replicator, plPHP, plPerlNG and pgPHPToolkit http://www.commandprompt.com / http://www.postgresql.org
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> Here is what I have: >> Virgin install of RH ES 3.0 from cd's (no update run right now) >> >> When I try to start installing the Postgresql rpms, I get the following: >> [root@localhost postgresql_rpms]# rpm -Uvh >> postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG.i686.rpm >> warning: postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG.i686.rpm: V3 DSA signature: >> NOKEY, key ID 748f7d0e >> error: Failed dependencies: >> libecpg.so.4 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG >> libpgtypes.so.1 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG >> libpq.so.3 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG >> Suggested resolutions: >> rh-postgresql-libs-7.3.4-8.i386.rpm > > > It looks like you already have postgresql installed via RH 3. You need > to remove it first, then install 8. > > Honestly, when working with the RH ES version it is better to compile > anyway. > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake > > > > > I have checked, and postgresql is not installed on the system. Are there some dependent rpms that the postgresql-lib rpm needs? Why do you say it is better to compile (besides getting a "customized" postgresql)? Are there major problems with the rpm builds? Our management team really wants us to get away from compiling Postgresql if at all possible. So, I am going to need a very good argument to keep compiling Postgresql when we do this next project. Thanks, Chris
What I did was do the redhat install (was AS4) without checking postgres and the rpm installed fine. Asked for a redhat CD but no other issues. I believe you can uninstall it too, but I did not try that. Also make sure no security SELinux stuff. Joel Fradkin Wazagua, Inc. 2520 Trailmate Dr Sarasota, Florida 34243 Tel. 941-753-7111 ext 305 jfradkin@wazagua.com www.wazagua.com Powered by Wazagua Providing you with the latest Web-based technology & advanced tools. C 2004. WAZAGUA, Inc. All rights reserved. WAZAGUA, Inc This email message is for the use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and delete and destroy all copies of the original message, including attachments. -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Chris Hoover Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 1:09 PM To: Joshua D. Drake Cc: PostgreSQL Admin Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Help installing 8.0.2 rpms on RH 3.0 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> Here is what I have: >> Virgin install of RH ES 3.0 from cd's (no update run right now) >> >> When I try to start installing the Postgresql rpms, I get the following: >> [root@localhost postgresql_rpms]# rpm -Uvh >> postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG.i686.rpm >> warning: postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG.i686.rpm: V3 DSA signature: >> NOKEY, key ID 748f7d0e >> error: Failed dependencies: >> libecpg.so.4 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG >> libpgtypes.so.1 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG >> libpq.so.3 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG >> Suggested resolutions: >> rh-postgresql-libs-7.3.4-8.i386.rpm > > > It looks like you already have postgresql installed via RH 3. You need > to remove it first, then install 8. > > Honestly, when working with the RH ES version it is better to compile > anyway. > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake > > > > > I have checked, and postgresql is not installed on the system. Are there some dependent rpms that the postgresql-lib rpm needs? Why do you say it is better to compile (besides getting a "customized" postgresql)? Are there major problems with the rpm builds? Our management team really wants us to get away from compiling Postgresql if at all possible. So, I am going to need a very good argument to keep compiling Postgresql when we do this next project. Thanks, Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
> I have checked, and postgresql is not installed on the system. Are > there some dependent rpms that the postgresql-lib rpm needs? > > Why do you say it is better to compile (besides getting a "customized" > postgresql)? Are there major problems with the rpm builds? Well besides what you just ran into? Although I would agree it isn't major. RPM builds on ES I just find a pain. There always seems to be something missing. An option, which is what Command Prompt employs is to use source to create our own RPM so we don't have to deal with any odd decisions by the original packagers. On to your actual problem. What happens if you download all the separate package rpms for postgresql and just do: rpm -ivh *.rpm ? That should resolve any dependency within itself. Our > management team really wants us to get away from compiling Postgresql if > at all possible. So, I am going to need a very good argument to keep > compiling Postgresql when we do this next project. My initial question would be what is managements argument but I probably know the answer to that. It really depends on your environment but you may want to try the src.rpm (SRPMS) option. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Thanks, > > Chris > -- Your PostgreSQL solutions provider, Command Prompt, Inc. 24x7 support - 1.800.492.2240, programming, and consulting Home of PostgreSQL Replicator, plPHP, plPerlNG and pgPHPToolkit http://www.commandprompt.com / http://www.postgresql.org
Ok, I thought I'd try the 8.0.1 rpms just for giggles. I was able to install the postgresql-libs rpm for 8.0.1 with out a problem. It looks like there is a bug in the 8.0.2 if you are installing from scratch. Can someone please point me to the proper place to log this bug. Chris
"Chris Hoover" <revoohc@sermonaudio.com> writes:
> ... However, I am having some difficulty installing the
> postgresql.org RH 3.0 rpms for Postgresql 8.0.2.
Up until really recently (read: not yet shipped for Red Hat, and I'm
not sure about the PGDG RPMs), the 8.0 RPMs had the wrong Obsoletes:
data in them for replacing rh-postgresql RPMs with later postgresql
RPMs. So I'd definitely suggest removing *all* the rh-postgresql RPMs
before you try to install newer stuff. It wasn't real clear whether
that was the sum total of your problem however...
> Virgin install of RH ES 3.0 from cd's (no update run right now)
It wouldn't be a bad idea to do "up2date" first. For all you know
you are fighting a bug in RPM itself.
regards, tom lane
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, You need to build all software that runs with PostgreSQL. On my RHEL box, I've just symlinked libpq.so.4 to libpq.so.3 manually. Apply the same procedures for libecpg.so.4 and libpgtypes.so.1 . Regards, On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Chris Hoover wrote: > I need some help, > > I am doing initial investigation into the next project. Part of the project > is to upgrade from RH 2.1 to 3.0 (or greater) and to upgrade from Postgresql > 7.3.4 to a newer version. Currently we are compiling our version of > postgresql and I would really like to get away from that. However, I am > having some difficulty installing the postgresql.org RH 3.0 rpms for > Postgresql 8.0.2. > > Here is what I have: > Virgin install of RH ES 3.0 from cd's (no update run right now) > > When I try to start installing the Postgresql rpms, I get the following: > [root@localhost postgresql_rpms]# rpm -Uvh > postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG.i686.rpm > warning: postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG.i686.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key > ID 748f7d0e > error: Failed dependencies: > libecpg.so.4 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG > libpgtypes.so.1 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG > libpq.so.3 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG > Suggested resolutions: > rh-postgresql-libs-7.3.4-8.i386.rpm > > I've tried this with both the rh-postgresql-libs-7.3.4-8.i386.rpm installed > and not installed and am getting the same results. > What do I need to do to get the rpms to install???? > > Thanks for any help, > > Chris > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > - -- Devrim GUNDUZ devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.tdmsoft.com http://www.gunduz.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCXo+ctl86P3SPfQ4RAt6DAKCzp+i3LkF8EEGS12HPLIf0TP5EBACgykm7 B87qVvhZhS7aWPd2M+zbeac= =Wna8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Hi, > > You need to build all software that runs with PostgreSQL. Can you justify this statement with experiences? -- Until later, Geoffrey
Hi, On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Geoffrey wrote: >> You need to build all software that runs with PostgreSQL. > > Can you justify this statement with experiences? Sure. On my RHEL4 test box, I recompiled PHP from SRPM so that it will use libpq.so.4. I have some more apps that requires PostgreSQL at the backend, I did the same process for them, too. Regards, -- Devrim GUNDUZ devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.tdmsoft.com http://www.gunduz.org
Tom Lane wrote: >"Chris Hoover" <revoohc@sermonaudio.com> writes: > > >>... However, I am having some difficulty installing the >>postgresql.org RH 3.0 rpms for Postgresql 8.0.2. >> >> > >Up until really recently (read: not yet shipped for Red Hat, and I'm >not sure about the PGDG RPMs), the 8.0 RPMs had the wrong Obsoletes: >data in them for replacing rh-postgresql RPMs with later postgresql >RPMs. So I'd definitely suggest removing *all* the rh-postgresql RPMs >before you try to install newer stuff. It wasn't real clear whether >that was the sum total of your problem however... > > > >>Virgin install of RH ES 3.0 from cd's (no update run right now) >> >> > >It wouldn't be a bad idea to do "up2date" first. For all you know >you are fighting a bug in RPM itself. > > regards, tom lane > > > > > > Tom, It looks like it is a specific problem with the 8.0.2 rpms. Below is what I wrote about trying the 8.0.1 rpms. Ok, I thought I'd try the 8.0.1 rpms just for giggles. I was able to install the postgresql-libs rpm for 8.0.1 with out a problem. It looks like there is a bug in the 8.0.2 if you are installing from scratch. Can someone please point me to the proper place to log this bug. (sorry for the delay in response, I had some mail problems with my isp) Chris
Not sure if they were updated, but we (James from Dell, I watched) did remove all the 8.0.1 rpms and install 8.0.2 just fine. Joel Fradkin -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Chris Hoover Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 4:49 PM To: Tom Lane Cc: PostgreSQL Admin Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Help installing 8.0.2 rpms on RH 3.0 Tom Lane wrote: >"Chris Hoover" <revoohc@sermonaudio.com> writes: > > >>... However, I am having some difficulty installing the >>postgresql.org RH 3.0 rpms for Postgresql 8.0.2. >> >> > >Up until really recently (read: not yet shipped for Red Hat, and I'm >not sure about the PGDG RPMs), the 8.0 RPMs had the wrong Obsoletes: >data in them for replacing rh-postgresql RPMs with later postgresql >RPMs. So I'd definitely suggest removing *all* the rh-postgresql RPMs >before you try to install newer stuff. It wasn't real clear whether >that was the sum total of your problem however... > > > >>Virgin install of RH ES 3.0 from cd's (no update run right now) >> >> > >It wouldn't be a bad idea to do "up2date" first. For all you know >you are fighting a bug in RPM itself. > > regards, tom lane > > > > > > Tom, It looks like it is a specific problem with the 8.0.2 rpms. Below is what I wrote about trying the 8.0.1 rpms. Ok, I thought I'd try the 8.0.1 rpms just for giggles. I was able to install the postgresql-libs rpm for 8.0.1 with out a problem. It looks like there is a bug in the 8.0.2 if you are installing from scratch. Can someone please point me to the proper place to log this bug. (sorry for the delay in response, I had some mail problems with my isp) Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster