On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 05:41:12PM +0000, Amonson, Paul D wrote:
> > It would be good to know exactly what, if any, changes the Intel
> > lawyers want us to make to our license if we accept this patch.
>
> I asked about this and there is nothing Intel requires here license
> wise. They believe that there is nothing wrong with including Clause-3
> BSD like licenses under the PostgreSQL license. They only specified
> that for the source file, the applying license need to be present
> either as a link (which was previously discouraged in this thread)
> or the full text. Please note that I checked and for this specific
> Chromium license there is not SPDX codename so the entire text is
> required.
Okay, that is very interesting. Yes, we will have no problem
reproducing the exact license text in the source code. I think we can
remove the license issue as a blocker for this patch.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.