Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~
От
Michael Paquier
Тема
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~
Дата
Msg-id
YxqdK+bEBOYoeMZI@paquier.xyz
Ответ на
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ (Justin Pryzby)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 08:29:20AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > It seems silly to do it at runtime if it's possible to do it at link time. Thanks. This set of simplifications is too good to let go, and I have a window to look after the buildfarm today and tomorrow, which should be enough to take action if need be. Hence, I have applied the patch. Now, let's see what the buildfarm tells us ;) -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления