RE: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
Тема
RE: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows
Дата
Msg-id
TYAPR01MB5866F5F7764669A07C7F5E2FF5D8A@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
RE: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
RE: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
RE: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
RE: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
RE: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
RE: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
RE: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Yasir Shah <yasir.hussain.shah@gmail.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Yasir <yasir.hussain.shah@gmail.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Bryan Green <dbryan.green@gmail.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Bryan Green <dbryan.green@gmail.com>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Dear Horiguchi-san, Shlok,

> 
> At Fri, 6 Oct 2023 12:28:32 +0530, Shlok Kyal  wrote
> i> D:\project\pg_dev\bin>pg_ctl -D ../data -l data2.log start
> > pg_ctl: another server might be running; trying to start server anyway
> > waiting for server to start....pg_ctl: launcher shell died
> >
> > The output message after patch is different from the HEAD. I felt that
> > with patch as well we should get the message  "pg_ctl: could not start
> > server".
> > Is this message change intentional?
> 
> Partly no, partly yes. My focus was on verifying the accuracy of
> identifying the actual postmaster PID on Windows. The current patch
> provides a detailed description of the events, primarily because I
> lack a comprehensive understanding of both the behavior of Windows
> APIs and the associated processes.  Given that context, the messages
> essentially serve debugging purposes.
> 
> I agree with your suggestion.  Ultimately, if there's a possibility
> for this to be committed, the message will be consolidated to "could
> not start server".

Based on the suggestion, I tried to update the patch.
A new argument is_valid is added for reporting callee. Also, reporting formats
are adjusted based on other functions. How do you think?

Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Bharath Rupireddy
Дата:
От: Laurenz Albe
Дата:
FAQ