At Thu, 7 Sep 2023 10:53:41 +0000, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote in
> My first idea is that to move the checking part to above, but this may not handle
> the case the postmaster is still alive (now sure this is real issue). Do we have to
> add a new indicator which ensures the identity of processes for windows?
> Please tell me how you feel.
It doesn't seem to work as expected. We still lose the relationship
between the PID file and the launched postmaster.
> > Now, I
> > also recall that the processes spawned by pg_ctl on Windows make the
> > status handling rather tricky to reason about..
>
> Did you say about the below comment? Currently I have no idea to make
> codes more proper, sorry.
>
> ```
> * On Windows, we may be checking the postmaster's parent shell, but
> * that's fine for this purpose.
> ```
Ditching cmd.exe seems like a big hassle. So, on the flip side, I
tried to identify the postmaster PID using the shell's PID, and it
seem to work. The APIs used are avaiable from XP/2003 onwards.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center