Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mahendra Singh Thalor
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Дата
Msg-id CAKYtNAqWHvcOoJsS+aLv2h2k_7G=171Z6MddQYLrUiM5Uob1KA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 12:48, Masahiko Sawada
<masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 11:23, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 7:14 AM Masahiko Sawada
> > <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thank you for updating the patch. Yeah MAXDEADTUPLES is better than
> > > what I did in the previous version patch.
> > >
> >
> > Would you like to resubmit your vacuumdb utility patch for this
> > enhancement?  I see some old version of it and it seems to me that you
> > need to update that patch.
> >
> > + if (optarg != NULL)
> > + {
> > + parallel_workers = atoi(optarg);
> > + if (parallel_workers <= 0)
> > + {
> > + pg_log_error("number of parallel workers must be at least 1");
> > + exit(1);
> > + }
> > + }
> >
> > This will no longer be true.
>
> Attached the updated version patch.
>

Thanks Sawada-san for the re-based patch.

I reviewed and tested this patch.  Patch looks good to me.

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Mahendra Singh Thalor
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Append with naive multiplexing of FDWs
Следующее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: adding partitioned tables to publications