Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobP7VeUFC92Bi1O5E__iQtDSSrjvNrWHNNHyoYwLmWZZw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:37 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Attached the updated patch you proposed and the patch that converts
> the grammer productions for the VACUUM option on top of the former
> patch. The latter patch moves VacuumOption to vacuum.h since the
> parser no longer needs such information.

Committed.

> If we take this direction I will change the parallel vacuum patch so
> that it adds new PARALLEL option and adds 'nworkers' to VacuumParams.

Sounds good.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Row Level Security − leakproof-ness and performance implications
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #15641: Autoprewarm worker fails to start on Windows withhuge pages in use Old PostgreSQL community/pgsql-bugs x