Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Masahiko Sawada
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Дата
Msg-id CA+fd4k6DgwtQSr4=UeY+WbGuF7-oD=m-ypHPy+sYHiXZc+hTUQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 11:23, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 7:14 AM Masahiko Sawada
> <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for updating the patch. Yeah MAXDEADTUPLES is better than
> > what I did in the previous version patch.
> >
>
> Would you like to resubmit your vacuumdb utility patch for this
> enhancement?  I see some old version of it and it seems to me that you
> need to update that patch.
>
> + if (optarg != NULL)
> + {
> + parallel_workers = atoi(optarg);
> + if (parallel_workers <= 0)
> + {
> + pg_log_error("number of parallel workers must be at least 1");
> + exit(1);
> + }
> + }
>
> This will no longer be true.

Attached the updated version patch.

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada            http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Kellerer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we need to handle orphaned prepared transactions in theserver?
Следующее
От: Mahendra Singh Thalor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Error message inconsistency