Re: Fix for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW ownership error message

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Cramer
Тема Re: Fix for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW ownership error message
Дата
Msg-id CADK3HHJfve0+Y0h6ARfwJt=rxk5ZTiAD0iW_+8F4F8c+1ECBXg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Fix for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW ownership error message  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Fix for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW ownership error message
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения

On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 at 17:48, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes:
> This is a simple fix why push back ?

What was being pushed back on, I think, was the claim that this needed to
be back-patched.  I'd be inclined not to, since (a) the message is not
wrong, only less specific than it could be, and (b) people tend to get
annoyed by unnecessary behavior changes in released branches.


I was referring to:

 "Materialized views are a type of relation so it is not wrong, just one of many instances where we generalize to "relation" based in implementation details ins team of being explicit about which type of relation is being affected."  
 
As being push back.

I don't have an opinion on back patching this.


 

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fix for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW ownership error message
Следующее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fix for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW ownership error message