Re: Fix for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW ownership error message

Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes:
> This is a simple fix why push back ?

What was being pushed back on, I think, was the claim that this needed to
be back-patched.  I'd be inclined not to, since (a) the message is not
wrong, only less specific than it could be, and (b) people tend to get
annoyed by unnecessary behavior changes in released branches.

There might be an argument for putting it into v11, but not further back.

            regards, tom lane