Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmob8Avi59hOb7-hi64urH9Z1kcn54F7uQvxzG-CnHbm+ZQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 12/16/16 11:05 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> If we were going to do anything about this,
>>> my vote would be to remove sql_inheritance.
>
>> Go for it.
>
>> Let's also remove the table* syntax then.
>
> Meh --- that might break existing queries, to what purpose?
>
> We certainly shouldn't remove query syntax without a deprecation period.
> I'm less concerned about that for GUCs.

I agree.  Patch attached, just removing the GUC and a fairly minimal
amount of the supporting infrastructure.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: [HACKERS] Passwordidentifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol)
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API