Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance
Дата
Msg-id 13737.1481935186@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 12/16/16 11:05 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> If we were going to do anything about this,
>> my vote would be to remove sql_inheritance.

> Go for it.

> Let's also remove the table* syntax then.

Meh --- that might break existing queries, to what purpose?

We certainly shouldn't remove query syntax without a deprecation period.
I'm less concerned about that for GUCs.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API