Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance
Дата
Msg-id 20161219164848.usu6zbl2h7ielkdp@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> >> On 12/16/16 11:05 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >>> If we were going to do anything about this,
> >>> my vote would be to remove sql_inheritance.
> >
> >> Go for it.
> >
> >> Let's also remove the table* syntax then.
> >
> > Meh --- that might break existing queries, to what purpose?
> >
> > We certainly shouldn't remove query syntax without a deprecation period.
> > I'm less concerned about that for GUCs.
> 
> I agree.  Patch attached, just removing the GUC and a fairly minimal
> amount of the supporting infrastructure.

Any particular reason not to change inhOpt to be a simple boolean, and
remove the enum?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance