Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance
Дата
Msg-id 425fa56c-1087-f452-c2f5-3889be3bffaf@lab.ntt.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2016/12/17 10:40, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>> On 12/16/16 11:05 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> If we were going to do anything about this,
>>>> my vote would be to remove sql_inheritance.
>>
>>> Go for it.
>>
>>> Let's also remove the table* syntax then.
>>
>> Meh --- that might break existing queries, to what purpose?
>>
>> We certainly shouldn't remove query syntax without a deprecation period.
>> I'm less concerned about that for GUCs.
> 
> I agree.  Patch attached, just removing the GUC and a fairly minimal
> amount of the supporting infrastructure.

+1 to removing the sql_inheritance GUC.  The patch looks good to me.

Thanks,
Amit





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Следующее
От: Erik Rijkers
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP