Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZSaYaNdee9KH3CTzeOgTZ2gPXzEeRAgwLc9_Ez114Dfg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> I agree.  Patch attached, just removing the GUC and a fairly minimal
>> amount of the supporting infrastructure.
>
> +1 to removing the sql_inheritance GUC.  The patch looks good to me.

Great, committed.  I realize just now that I forgot to credit anyone
as a reviewer, but hopefully nobody's going to mind that too much
considering this is a purely mechanical patch I wrote in 20 minutes.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: tushar
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Server Crash while running sqlsmith [TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(keylen< 64)", File: "hashfunc.c", Line: 139) ]
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Logical decoding on standby