Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect: Hash index support

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect: Hash index support
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa6cKSV26d_XMwqw2Hwh_hk5wZpuVJg18WTVQ-L6vr+Aw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect: Hash index support  (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect: Hash index support  (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect: Hash index support  (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +               ptr = (char *) itup + IndexInfoFindDataOffset(itup->t_info);
>> +               Assert(ptr <= uargs->page + BLCKSZ);
>>
>> I think this should be promoted to an ereport(); these functions can
>> accept an arbitrary bytea.
>
> I think we had added 'ptr' variable initially just to dump hash code
> in hexadecimal format but now since we have removed that logic from
> current code, I think it is no  more required and I have therefore
> removed it from the current patch. Below is the code that used it
> initially. It got changed as per your comment - [1]

OK.

> I think it's OK to check hash_bitmap_info() or any other functions
> with different page types at least once.
>
> [1]- https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZUjrVy52TUU3b_Q5L6jcrt7w5R4qFwMXdeCuKQBmYWqQ%40mail.gmail.com

Sure, I just don't know if we need to test them 4 or 5 times.  But I
think this is good enough for now - it's not like this code is written
in stone once committed.

So, committed.  Wow, I wish every patch had this many reviewers.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Provide list of subscriptions and publications inpsql's completion
Следующее
От: Jesper Pedersen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect: Hash index support