On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> On 07/06/2016 12:02 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>>
>> On 07/06/2016 07:55 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/06/2016 10:54 AM, Rader, David wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I am concerned that the "bare metal" description is misleading to users,
>>>> since on both the Linux and Windows installers an OS is still required.
>>>> Suggesting that the installer can setup a full stack including OS will
>>>> be confusing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Bare metal is an industry standard term for, "not virtualized".
>>
>>
>> it is but it is usually used in the context of operating systems - so I
>> kinda agree with david here that personally I would expect something
>> that is for "bare metal" is something that can directly be installed on
>> physical hardware (as in an OS).
>
>
> I am good either way, I was just expressing my experience.
That has been my experience too, both in the office and in dealing
with large and small customers.
I really don't care if it says "non-virtualised" instead though.
As an Englishman, I reserve the right to get irked by
"non-virtualized" though. :-)
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company