Re: UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Artis Caune
Тема Re: UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)
Дата
Msg-id 9e20d71e0809240352q3c7f1478qfa2a78aac95eb6f@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)  (Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> wrote:
> Here is my opinion: I suspect that gjournal would be much slower than
> soft updates. Also gjournal is relatively new code, not very well
> tested.

In some cases it's much faster than SU, in other a bit slower. :)
gjournal is quiet "old" code, it's already more than two years around,
and very stable. Haven't seen any gjournal related crash.





--
regards,
Artis Caune

<----. CCNA
<----|====================
<----' didii FreeBSD

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Claus Guttesen"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)
Следующее
От: Matthew Wakeling
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Different execution plan