Re: UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Claus Guttesen
Тема Re: UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)
Дата
Msg-id b41c75520809240339t7f74278eu4d314b5f4b21b7f5@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)  (Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
> Should I use gjournal on FreeBSD 7? Or just soft updates?
>
> Here is my opinion: I suspect that gjournal would be much slower than
> soft updates. Also gjournal is relatively new code, not very well
> tested. But gjournal is better when the system crashes. Although I have
> heard that sometimes gjournal will crash the system itself. There are
> more pros for soft updates I would pefer that. But please let me
> know if I'm wrong.

If softupdates suites your needs why not just use that? :-) Is
performance adequate with softupdates? I have a 103 GB db on FreeBSD
7.0 and softupdates and it has survived one unplanned stop when we had
a power-outage lasting some hours.

--
regards
Claus

When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentler gamester is the soonest winner.

Shakespeare

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Laszlo Nagy
Дата:
Сообщение: UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)
Следующее
От: "Artis Caune"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)