> On 9 Jun 2016, at 22:38, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:32:30PM +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>>> At that rate, roughly, roughly 14,000 reads of such emails by
>>> non-grantors per month. Multiply by the time you figure it takes
>>> to blow through each to get wasted person-hours per month with the
>>> current approach.
>>
>> well - as said before, we are very open to better ways to do this but
>> just putting more burden on the people who can grant access by having to
>
> The burden is what? Having privilege grantors subscribe to another
> email list? What other burdens are there?
No, managing and likely moderation of every single request to the list.
>
>> read even more lists is not a very good tradeoff for me. The pgsql-www@
>> charter is regarding development and organization of the postgresql
>> websites (which the wiki is clearly part of imho),
>> if granting access to a previously heavily abused website which very
>> high visibility in the community does not fit under "organisation" I'm
>> not sure what else does...
>
> Well, I think the big question is whether a significant percentage of
> people subscribed to the www list _potentially_ have any ability to
> offer feedback to the requests. I think the problem is that I can
> _potentially_ comment on 50% of the postings, and can't for the wiki
> access requests. I can't think of another community email list like
> that.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
>
> + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
> + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www