Re: Installing PostgreSQL as "postgress" versus "root" Debate!
| От | Dawid Kuroczko |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Installing PostgreSQL as "postgress" versus "root" Debate! |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 758d5e7f05011304065d7e56a0@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Installing PostgreSQL as "postgress" versus "root" Debate! ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Installing PostgreSQL as "postgress" versus "root" Debate!
|
| Список | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:52:16 -0800, Joshua D. Drake
<jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> >Whatever, I'll keep root only for absolutely restricted use & install
> >under a separate user account. Works just fine & it makes the auditors
> >& sysadmin feel better.
> I don't argue the point of using root. I agree with you there.
> Just the point that if it is owned by root it executes as root.
But only if either setuid root or executed by root. Hey, on my
system even /bin/sh is owned by root; it would be funny of it
executed as root
I see one reason to use 'postgres' as the install user -- to give
access to psql binaries to group of users (say, members of
postgres group). But I think PostgreSQL's own permission
system is enough for the job. :)
Regards,
Dawid
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: