Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?
Дата
Msg-id
629054.1686403658@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? (Julien Rouhaud)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Julien Rouhaud writes: > On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 08:56:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> - rte->relkind = 0; > and also handle that field in (read|out)funcs.c Oh, right. Ugh, that means a catversion bump. It's not like we've never done that during beta, but it's kind of an annoying cost for a detail as tiny as this. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления