Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?
От
Julien Rouhaud
Тема
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?
Дата
Msg-id
20230610131857.cqrsm6pwq3k47yuv@jrouhaud
Ответ на
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 08:56:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Well, if we're gonna do it we should do it for v16, rather than > change the data structure twice. It wouldn't be hard exactly: > > /* > * Clear fields that should not be set in a subquery RTE. Note that we > * leave the relid, rellockmode, and perminfoindex fields set, so that the > * view relation can be appropriately locked before execution and its > * permissions checked. > */ > - rte->relkind = 0; > rte->tablesample = NULL; > rte->inh = false; /* must not be set for a subquery */ > > plus adjustment of that comment and probably also the comment > for struct RangeTblEntry. and also handle that field in (read|out)funcs.c
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления