Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?
Дата
Msg-id CA+HiwqFaMfM-082vwNYSAWU13T9nd62DObeNLbSTisSh6odOog@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Ответы Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 15:51 David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
On 6/9/23 19:14, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> writes:
>> Thank you, this was very helpful. I am able to get the expected result
>> now with:
>
>> /* We only care about tables/views and can ignore subqueries, etc. */
>> if (!(rte->rtekind == RTE_RELATION ||
>>        (rte->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY && OidIsValid(rte->relid))))
>>       continue;
>
> Right, that matches places like add_rtes_to_flat_rtable().

Good to have confirmation of that, thanks!

>> One thing, though, rte->relkind is not set for views, so I still need to
>> call get_rel_relkind(rte->relid). Not a big deal, but do you think it
>> would make sense to set rte->relkind for views?
>
> If you see "rte->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY && OidIsValid(rte->relid)",
> it's dead certain that relid refers to a view, so you could just wire
> in that knowledge.

Yeah, that's a good trick. Even so, I wonder why relkind is not set when
relid is set?

I too have been thinking that setting relkind might be a good idea, even if only as a crosscheck that only view relations can look like that in the range table.
--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Steele
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?
Следующее
От: David Steele
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?