Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 470644.1686327286@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> writes:
> Thank you, this was very helpful. I am able to get the expected result
> now with:
> /* We only care about tables/views and can ignore subqueries, etc. */
> if (!(rte->rtekind == RTE_RELATION ||
> (rte->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY && OidIsValid(rte->relid))))
> continue;
Right, that matches places like add_rtes_to_flat_rtable().
> One thing, though, rte->relkind is not set for views, so I still need to
> call get_rel_relkind(rte->relid). Not a big deal, but do you think it
> would make sense to set rte->relkind for views?
If you see "rte->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY && OidIsValid(rte->relid)",
it's dead certain that relid refers to a view, so you could just wire
in that knowledge.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: