Re: [HACKERS] proposal: EXPLAIN ANALYZE formatting

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] proposal: EXPLAIN ANALYZE formatting
Дата
Msg-id 6096.1485619776@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] proposal: EXPLAIN ANALYZE formatting  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] proposal: EXPLAIN ANALYZE formatting  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> Now EXPLAIN ANALYZE produce too wide rows for usage in presentations

> What do you think about possibility to implement >>optional<< alternative
> formatting.
> Now:
>   node name (estimation) (actual)
> Alternative:
>   node name (estimation)
>                    (actual)

Seems like that would make a difference in only a tiny minority of
situations.  In a deeply nested plan you'll have trouble no matter
what, and it's not uncommon that the node name line isn't the widest
thing anyway.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] proposal: EXPLAIN ANALYZE formatting
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Removing link-time cross-module refs in contrib