Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid)
| От | Joel Jacobson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5552680124847797655@iso-8859-1msgid обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Sent from my iPhone On 7 jan 2011, at 20:46, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com> writes: >> The function obj_unique_identifier(oid) will return a unique name for _any_ oid. > > Surely this is broken by design? You can *not* assume that the same OID > isn't in use for different things in different system catalogs. They're > only guaranteed unique within a catalog. That's the main reason why > pg_depend has to include the classid. > > regards, tom lane Correct. That is why the regclass name (classid) is included in the unique name.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: