Re: Bug in pg_describe_object, patch v2

On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 14:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> One other point here is that I find messages like this a mite
> unreadable:
> 
> function 1 (oidvector[], oidvector[]) btoidvectorcmp(oidvector,oidvector) of operator family array_ops for access
methodgin
 
> 
> If we were to go with this, I'd be strongly tempted to rearrange all
> four of the messages involved to put the operator or function name
> at the end, eg
> 
> function 1 (oidvector[], oidvector[]) of operator family array_ops for access method gin:
btoidvectorcmp(oidvector,oidvector)

Yes, I agree with you that the second is much more readable with out
without the lefttype and righttype.

function 1 of operator family array_ops for access method gin: btoidvectorcmp(oidvector,oidvector)

is more readable in my opinion than,

function 1 btoidvectorcmp(oidvector,oidvector) of operator family array_ops for access method gin

Regards,
Andreas