Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid)
| От | Joel Jacobson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3615046013433274531@unknownmsgid обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid) (Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
The function should take both classid and oid as input. I'll fix. Sent from my iPhone On 7 jan 2011, at 20:59, Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com> wrote: > Sent from my iPhone > > On 7 jan 2011, at 20:46, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com> writes: >>> The function obj_unique_identifier(oid) will return a unique name for _any_ oid. >> >> Surely this is broken by design? You can *not* assume that the same OID >> isn't in use for different things in different system catalogs. They're >> only guaranteed unique within a catalog. That's the main reason why >> pg_depend has to include the classid. >> >> regards, tom lane > > Correct. That is why the regclass name (classid) is included in the unique name.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: