Re: Bug in pg_describe_object
| От | Andreas Karlsson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Bug in pg_describe_object |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1294771675.14741.5.camel@jansson обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Bug in pg_describe_object (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Bug in pg_describe_object
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 11:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > If that's what you're after, getObjectDescription is entirely > unsuitable, because of the fact that its results are dependent > on search path and language settings. > > regards, tom lane Agreed, and as long as the additional information added to the description by my patch is not useful for any other purpose I see no reason for applying it. So would anyone be confused by a description of pg_amproc not including the types? I personally have no idea since I have not had to work with indexes enough to say. Andreas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: