Re: Bug in pg_describe_object, patch v2

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> So I don't want to give up the details of the function
>> or operator. �But sticking them at the end after a colon might make it
>> clearer that the func/operator is referenced by the amproc or amop
>> entry, but is not the same thing.

> That seems like an improvement over the status quo, so do you want to
> go ahead and do that?

Are you voting to commit the patch I presented plus that change, or do
something different?
        regards, tom lane