Filesystem vs. Postgres for images

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michal Hlavac
Тема Filesystem vs. Postgres for images
Дата
Msg-id 407BA86E.4010904@medium13.sk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images  ("Development - multi.art.studio" <dev.null@multiartstudio.com>)
Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images  (Cott Lang <cott@internetstaff.com>)
Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images  (Anton Nikiforov <anton@nikiforov.ru>)
Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images  (Phil Endecott <spam_from_postgresql_general@chezphil.org>)
Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images  ("Development - multi.art.studio" <dev.null@multiartstudio.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Hello,

I am working on web portal. There are some ads. We have about 200 000
ads. Every ad have own directory called ID, where is 5 subdirectories
with various sizes of 5 images.

Filesystem is too slow. But I don't know, if I store these images into
postgres, performace will grow.

Second question is, what kind of hardware I need for storing in DB. Now
I have Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.70GHz with 512MB RAM and 120GB HDD.

thanx for advices...

miso

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Richard Huxton
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Executing script file
Следующее
От: Michal Hlavac
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Data Encryption in PostgreSQL, and a Tutorial.