Re: Could we do pgindent on just utils/adt/xml.c in the 8.3 branch?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Could we do pgindent on just utils/adt/xml.c in the 8.3 branch?
Дата
Msg-id 22347.1267415179@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Could we do pgindent on just utils/adt/xml.c in the 8.3 branch?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: Could we do pgindent on just utils/adt/xml.c in the 8.3 branch?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Sure, I can easily do that, but I am not sure how to generate a typedef
> list for that release, except to use the old typedef collection method
> for that file.  Is that OK?

One of the things I noticed while patching was that the 8.3 typedef list
was missing xmlChar and a few other typedefs that are used a lot in that
file :-(.  So please don't use the same method you used in 8.3.

I think it would be close enough to use the current (just added to CVS)
typedef list.  Or use the one you used for 8.4 if you have it handy.
There is not a lot of difference between the 8.3 and current code in
that file, so either of those are probably going to give you the same
results.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Could we do pgindent on just utils/adt/xml.c in the 8.3 branch?
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: dedebugging and a functions that just don't work on debian flavour