Re: Could we do pgindent on just utils/adt/xml.c in the 8.3 branch?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Could we do pgindent on just utils/adt/xml.c in the 8.3 branch?
Дата
Msg-id 201003010321.o213LKq29625@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Could we do pgindent on just utils/adt/xml.c in the 8.3 branch?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Could we do pgindent on just utils/adt/xml.c in the 8.3 branch?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> I just committed a backpatch of
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-05/msg00229.php
> to 8.3.  As in that patch, I did not try to manually reindent the code
> that's now wrapped in PG_TRY blocks.  It might be a good idea to run
> pgindent on just that one file so that it's spacing-consistent with
> the later branches.  This will ease any future backpatching in that
> file.

Sure, I can easily do that, but I am not sure how to generate a typedef
list for that release, except to use the old typedef collection method
for that file.  Is that OK?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 PG East:  http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Could we do pgindent on just utils/adt/xml.c in the 8.3 branch?