Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> Hm, no, that logic is the same as before no?
> Well I had
> if (!control->relocatable && control->schema != NULL)
> And you have
> + else if (control->schema != NULL)
Yeah, I deleted that relocatable test because it's redundant:
control->schema cannot be set for a relocatable extension,
cf the test in read_extension_control_file.
regards, tom lane