Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 01/20/2014 10:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I think the idea was that patch authors should take responsibility for
> > pushing their patches forward to 2014-01 if they still wanted them
> > considered. Quite a few patches already were moved that way, IIRC.
> >
> > Agreed though that we shouldn't let them just rot.
>
> Does this mean I can resurrect my pg_sleep_until() patch? I didn't set
> it back to Needs Review after I completely changed my approach based on
> feedback. I would hate for it to get lost just because I didn't know
> how to use the commitfest app.
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1189
No objection here.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services