Re: Closing commitfest 2013-11
| От | Vik Fearing |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Closing commitfest 2013-11 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 52DECCB5.9000501@dalibo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Closing commitfest 2013-11 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Closing commitfest 2013-11
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/20/2014 10:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I think the idea was that patch authors should take responsibility for > pushing their patches forward to 2014-01 if they still wanted them > considered. Quite a few patches already were moved that way, IIRC. > > Agreed though that we shouldn't let them just rot. Does this mean I can resurrect my pg_sleep_until() patch? I didn't set it back to Needs Review after I completely changed my approach based on feedback. I would hate for it to get lost just because I didn't know how to use the commitfest app. https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1189 -- Vik
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: