Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> As of fairly recently, the Fedora package also uses pg_ctl for both
> >> starting and stopping. We've fixed all the reasons that formerly
> >> existed to avoid use of pg_ctl, and it's a real PITA to try to
> >> implement the waiting logic at shell level.
>
> > OK, that's a good use-case to warrant barrelling ahead with improving
> > pg_ctl for config-only installs.
>
> Did I say that? The Fedora packages don't support config-only
> arrangements (if you tried, SELinux would likely deny access to whatever
> directory you chose ...)
>
> > What releases do we want to apply that
> > patch to allow postgres to dump config values and have pg_ctl use them?
> > This patch is required for old/new installs for pg_upgrade to work.
>
> I still think this is a matter for HEAD only. We haven't supported
> these cases in back branches and so there is little argument for
> back-patching.
OK. Just be aware that limits pg_upgrade to only upgrading old
config-only installs of PG 9.2+, e.g. old PG 9.2 to new PG 9.3.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +