Tom Lane wrote:
> Barry Lind <blind@xythos.com> writes:
> > I plan to clear some time very soon to work on moving jdbc to the
> > version 3 protocol. What is the status of the version 3 protocol
> > changes, are you done?
>
> I have implemented everything I wanted to do at the protocol level
> except for fixing the handling of binary values, which is something
> I hope to get done in the next few days. It's not too soon to start
> working on JDBC's support, if you have free time now. There are lots
> of loose ends (for instance, *every* backend error currently returns
> the same "XX000" SQLSTATE code) but I do not think there are any
> showstoppers for frontend development.
>
> > And yes an extra couple of weeks would ensure that I get more of the
> > version 3 protocol functionality into the jdbc driver.
>
> Check. The wind seems to be blowing towards a July 1 beta date.
Tom, I am seeing "IN ... func..." in the server logs for every LOG:
message. Is that planned behavior?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073