Re: [pgsql-www] source documentation tool doxygen
От
Andrew Dunstan
Тема
Re: [pgsql-www] source documentation tool doxygen
Дата
Msg-id
1094.24.211.165.134.1137501759.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Ответ на
Re: [pgsql-www] source documentation tool doxygen (Joachim Wieland)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
source documentation tool doxygen Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [pgsql-www] source documentation tool doxygen "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Re: [pgsql-www] source documentation tool doxygen Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com>
Re: [pgsql-www] source documentation tool doxygen Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>
Re: [pgsql-www] source documentation tool doxygen Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Re: [pgsql-www] source documentation tool doxygen Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>
Re: [pgsql-www] source documentation tool doxygen "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: [pgsql-www] source documentation tool doxygen Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Thomas Hallgren <thomas@tada.se>
Re: source documentation tool doxygen "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Jonathan Gardner <jgardner@jonathangardner.net>
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com>
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Thomas Hallgren <thomas@tada.se>
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Kim Bisgaard <kib@dmi.dk>
Joachim Wieland said: > Do you want to put it on the postgresql.org site nevertheless? Is it > too big to be mirrored and should be recreated on every webserver? We > might need one copy for the last version of every major release as well > as one for cvs. The latter should get updated regularly of course but I > figure it would be sufficient to do that once a week... > The overwhelming amount of development work gets done against HEAD. I would start with a once a day run against HEAD, and possibly one against the latest stable branch (currently REL8_1_STABLE in cvs). That would get you 99% of the possible benefit, I think. I don't see any virtue in doing it against a release as opposed to a stable branch - this is to help development efforts so it should be against what people should be basing their development efforts on. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления