Re: source documentation tool doxygen
| От | Neil Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: source documentation tool doxygen |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1137436300.9145.78.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: source documentation tool doxygen ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: source documentation tool doxygen
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 07:57 -0600, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I too have done this. But retrofitting Doxygen style comments to the > PostgreSQL source code would be a big undertaking. Maintaining it, which > would be another task for reviewers/committers, would also be a pain unless > there were some automated checking tool. I don't think it would be all that painful. There would be no need to convert the entire source tree to use proper Doxygen-style comments in one fell swoop: individual files and modules can be converted whenever anyone gets the inclination to do so. I don't think the maintenance burden would be very substantial, either. -Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: