Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1072099024.1627.49.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please (Paul Thomas <paul@tmsl.demon.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please
Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 2003-12-21 at 08:37, Paul Thomas wrote: > On 20/12/2003 18:04 Dave Cramer wrote: > > I'm actually starting to write one of these for postgres, and apparently > > there is another one in the works, from Thomas Hallgren. > > > > There is at least one significant architectural issue here to deal with > > > > Is it more desirable to have a single java vm and communicate via RPC, > > or some other mechanism? ie sockets, or ? The alternative is to > > instantiate a java vm for every connection, this could be onerous as > > there would be considerable overhead for each java vm. > > I think anything other than a single jvm would be too much of a > performance hit. Ok, I tend to agree, so does anyone have any preferences for a protocol? RMI, RPC, XML-RPC ? Anything better? > > > This will all go away as soon as java version 1.5 comes out but in the > > meantime, what does everyone think > > > > Comments are welcome. > > On platforms built with GCC3.2+, GCJ might be an alternative. There are numerous issues with classpath stuff with GCJ, but I'm certainly willing to look at it. Dave > > -- > Paul Thomas > +------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+ > | Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for the Smaller > Business | > | Computer Consultants | > http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk | > +------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+ > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: