Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please
От | Paul Thomas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20031221133732.A23409@bacon обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please ("Tony (Unihost)" <tony@unihost.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 20/12/2003 18:04 Dave Cramer wrote: > I'm actually starting to write one of these for postgres, and apparently > there is another one in the works, from Thomas Hallgren. > > There is at least one significant architectural issue here to deal with > > Is it more desirable to have a single java vm and communicate via RPC, > or some other mechanism? ie sockets, or ? The alternative is to > instantiate a java vm for every connection, this could be onerous as > there would be considerable overhead for each java vm. I think anything other than a single jvm would be too much of a performance hit. > This will all go away as soon as java version 1.5 comes out but in the > meantime, what does everyone think > > Comments are welcome. On platforms built with GCC3.2+, GCJ might be an alternative. -- Paul Thomas +------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+ | Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for the Smaller Business | | Computer Consultants | http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk | +------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: