Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please
От | Paul Thomas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20031222145525.A26330@bacon обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 22/12/2003 13:17 Dave Cramer wrote: > [snip] > > I think anything other than a single jvm would be too much of a > > performance hit. > > Ok, I tend to agree, so does anyone have any preferences for a protocol? > RMI, RPC, XML-RPC ? Anything better? My instinct would be to go with something fast and lightweight. > > On platforms built with GCC3.2+, GCJ might be an alternative. > There are numerous issues with classpath stuff with GCJ, but I'm > certainly willing to look at it. Yes, it has its problems I agree. And it would only be available on a small subset of all the platforms on which PostgreSQL runs. But it would eliminate the need for a jvm which is why I suggested it. Swings and roundabouts I suppose. -- Paul Thomas +------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+ | Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for the Smaller Business | | Computer Consultants | http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk | +------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: